Everyone, who has ever studied branding or corporate identity, knows that the Nazis were the masters. All communist countries must have studied the lessons.
That said, one instance that I spotted in Vietnam confused me.
This tree is beside the beach in Da Nang. The only explanation for planting national flags in trees is to influence birds and squirrels. That's taking branding one step further than Adolph's crew!
This is about branding and logos. I understand their importance, but often find them irritating. Too much of a good thing or too little of a necessary thing...
I do not like to wear clothes with prominent branding. I like nice things, but do not need to advertise to the world my choices. My personality is not logo-based. I will not buy an item if the logo is too obvious.
On the other hand, I have been frustrated by lack of branding on an item needing repair. It is impossible to search for parts, if you do not know the manufacturer or article number.
It would easy to compare logos to women and say that "you can't live with them and can't live without them", but I'll avoid the wrath such a claim might incur...
Everyone else seems to be using the guy's name in vain, so I'll get on the stick, jump on that bandwagon, and beat that dead horse.
It seems that this "gentleman" has become extremely popular with Fox News pundits, talk radio blowhards, and dodgy Republican politicians. His name is the default criticism of anyone that disagrees with their ridiculous positions or opinions on anything.
Of course, it's obvious from their rhetoric, that few have read any history or the man's biography. I doubt any could find Germany on a map or know that the man was Austrian. "Hitler" and "Nazi" are easy labels to hang on anything to incite a rapid crowd of bigger idiots with even less general knowledge.
What got me going on this topic? I read that Qaddafi has called the coalition forces "Nazis" and their political leaders "Hitler". This must be irony. He also has not read history. He's the one that has bombed his own people; Hitler bombed other nations, not his own. He was rather benevolent to his own citizens (except the Jews, of course), unlike Stalin, Saddam Husein, Mugabe, and Qaddafi, to name only a few.
I do not want to apologize for old Adolf, I merely want people to get their symbolism correct. I realize that blowhards in the US use Hitler, because he cannot sue them for slander. He is simple (for simple-minded speakers and listeners) shorthand for evil, even if his name has been degraded from over-use.
Hitler made one big mistake. He failed to brand his name, likeness, and symbols of power (best CI ever). He should have trademarked everything and licensed the whole lot to some US corporation. Since all the big ones (IBM, GM, Ford) were doing business with the German government throughout WWII, he had enough potential partners that understood the power of brands. Unfortunately, only idiots can reap value from his memory.