If you want to become angry (unless, of course, you happen to be a wealthy American) and, perhaps, concerned about the future of a once-great, once-respected country, simply read the Vanity Fair article written by Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz (http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105).
This is a disturbing article, which illustrates many things I have observed and even written about. I have noticed how the country has been evolving in the wrong direction and am concerned that there is no solution. Someday--not in this generation--people will rise up against the inequity. The wide spread of firearms will make it rather messy and unpleasant, not that mass uprising ever are. Even the police may change sides, having noticed that wealthy politicians keep lowering their pay and benefits. At some point, the military could also notice the inequity and might no longer be placated by calls for patriotism and flag waving by those who make no sacrifice or even know the meaning of the word.
I cannot imagine becoming a revolutionary. I have never been a dissident. Although I attended a very liberal college during the period of dissent against an unpopular war, I never joined in. I have a lot of patience and a long fuse. Things must be desperate before I jump on any bandwagon. Being an introvert, I would never join a crowd: I would dislike most of the people.
Instead, I observe. I notice what’s going on and am selectively empathetic. I study the issues on both sides and check out a bit of history. I compare, evaluate, and judge, but remain on the sidelines or in the background.
My criticisms are aimed at improving the situation. On a large canvas, such as antiwar dissent, my tiny brush (a mote of dust in a stadium) makes no impact; in a smaller setting, I might get some attention. I got in trouble in the Army for pointing out inefficiencies and stupid practices. Big organizations do not like to change, especially based on impulses from below. When working for large corporations, I occasionally found ways to carefully exert influence on foolish practices or waste.
Returning to the subject of revolutions, I read an interesting article in Vanity Fair about the recent uprising in Egypt. It rose like a tsunami, but the waters have returned to their previous calm. Forces have dissipated, because the powers-that-be have been able to take advantage of inertia and lack of leadership. Masses tend to be like sheep or lemmings, whether in third world countries or modern democracies. The better off people believe they are, the lower the voter count. Even with the power to vote for leaders, too many act against their own best interest, fooled into believing lies and fearing all the wrong things.
In the article by Christopher Hitchens is a statement about Iran (and revolutions is general)...
“...able to rely on the passivity of a large and fairly pious rural population, itself dependent in turn on state subsidy. Heroism breaks its heart, and idealism its back, on the intransigence of the credulous and the mediocre, manipulated by the cynical and the corrupt.”
...but this statement could apply also to the United States.